{"id":46330,"date":"2025-01-27T09:28:57","date_gmt":"2025-01-27T08:28:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/publikationen\/after-two-years-of-g-2-21-case-law-is-the-interpretation-now-settling-managing-ip-2023\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T10:06:50","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T09:06:50","slug":"after-two-years-of-g-2-21-case-law-is-the-interpretation-now-settling-managing-ip-2023","status":"publish","type":"publikationen","link":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/publications\/after-two-years-of-g-2-21-case-law-is-the-interpretation-now-settling-managing-ip-2023\/","title":{"rendered":"After two years of G 2\/21 case law, is the interpretation now settling? Managing IP, 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In their recent publication in Managing IP, Dr. Eva Ehlich and Dr. Anja Fux discuss a board of appeal decision on G 2\/21\u2019s interpretation, including a critical review of the interpretation in T 116\/18 while denying a request for further review.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-46330","publikationen","type-publikationen","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikationen"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46330\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46387,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46330\/revisions\/46387"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}