{"id":15047,"date":"2022-01-20T16:18:42","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T15:18:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/publikationen\/usb-stick-meets-sufficiently-specific-test-in-germany\/"},"modified":"2022-06-23T16:36:23","modified_gmt":"2022-06-23T14:36:23","slug":"usb-stick-meets-sufficiently-specific-test-in-germany","status":"publish","type":"publikationen","link":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/publications\/usb-stick-meets-sufficiently-specific-test-in-germany\/","title":{"rendered":"USB stick meets sufficiently specific test in Germany, 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/en\/team\/christian-meyer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Dr Christian Meyer<\/a> discusses in a publication of Managing Intellectual Property a case concerning the domain muenchen.de, in which a reference to a USB stick was found to be admissible in an application for an injunction.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-15047","publikationen","type-publikationen","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/15047","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikationen"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/15047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18397,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/15047\/revisions\/18397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/jp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}