{"id":46332,"date":"2025-01-27T09:32:09","date_gmt":"2025-01-27T08:32:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/?post_type=publikationen&#038;p=46332"},"modified":"2025-01-28T10:00:42","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T09:00:42","slug":"after-two-years-of-g-2-21-case-law-is-the-interpretation-now-settling-managing-ip-2025","status":"publish","type":"publikationen","link":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/publikationen\/after-two-years-of-g-2-21-case-law-is-the-interpretation-now-settling-managing-ip-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"After two years of G 2\/21 case law, is the interpretation now settling? Managing IP, 2025"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>In der neuesten Ver\u00f6ffentlichung bei Managing IP er\u00f6rtern Dr. Eva Ehlich und Dr. Anja Fux eine Entscheidung der Beschwerdekammer zur Auslegung von G 2\/21, einschlie\u00dflich einer kritischen \u00dcberpr\u00fcfung der Auslegung in T 116\/18, wobei ein Antrag auf weitere \u00dcberpr\u00fcfung abgelehnt wird.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-46332","publikationen","type-publikationen","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/publikationen"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46384,"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/publikationen\/46332\/revisions\/46384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.maiwald.eu\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}